The paper concludes with an obvious plea for rigor and relevance. He variously contradicts himself and puts forward bold contentions that cannot be sustained. Blaug commits a number of elementary blunders and mistakes the mathematical form of an argument for its content. It is shown that none of the criticisms stand up to close examination. The paper discusses Mark Blaug’s recent criticisms of “Sraffian economics”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |